Post by jebinkhatun2 on Mar 10, 2024 11:48:27 GMT 1
The Movie is Indiana Jones and the Dial of Destiny, Also Known as Indiana Jones . I Couldn't Help but Do the Same Test With Chatgpt , Which, Like the Google Search Engine, Gave the Correct Answer. By the Way, He Talked About the Latest Version of Chatgpt That is Included in Windows . At the End of the Test I Was Left With Mixed Feelings, on the One Hand I Was Disappointed That Bard Did Not Live Up to My Expectations, but on the Other Hand, I Breathed a Sigh of Relief Because I Thought That Bard Was Still Far.
From Taking My Job (at Least for Now ). Was Unfair, After All, Chatgpt Has the Advantage, Since It Was Launched in November and We Must Give Bard More Time to Learn More Tricks. However, This Little Test Was a Reminder of the Betting Number Data Imperfections of Ai, Defects That the Media Sometimes Seem Determined to Hide. And This Brings Me to an Even More Worrying Trend: Recently There Was a Small Scandal on Social Networks Due to a News Article Written by an Artificial Intelligence on the Technology Portal Gizmodo. The Note Was a Disaster , as It Was a Chronology of Star Wars Movies in Disarray and With Inaccuracies, but the Worrying Thing is That the Article Ranked Positively in Google's Search Algorithm.
That is to Say, We Are Reaching a Time in Which Bots Are Writing for Bots Themselves, and Worse Yet, Misinforming Human Users. Strictly Speaking, the Gizmodo Bot, Despite the Inaccuracies, Was Not at Fault, It Created an Attractive Piece to Be Included in the First Searches on Google. The Problem is With the Search Algorithm, Incapable of Choosing a Piece With Quality Information. Does This Mean That Generative Artificial Intelligences Are a Disaster? Not at All, It Simply Shows That There is a Learning Curve That Requires Time and Work, Despite the Millions of Dollars Invested and the Expectations of Millions of Technology Fans. By the Way, Chatgpt for the First Time in History Recorded a Decrease in Its Number of Users.
From Taking My Job (at Least for Now ). Was Unfair, After All, Chatgpt Has the Advantage, Since It Was Launched in November and We Must Give Bard More Time to Learn More Tricks. However, This Little Test Was a Reminder of the Betting Number Data Imperfections of Ai, Defects That the Media Sometimes Seem Determined to Hide. And This Brings Me to an Even More Worrying Trend: Recently There Was a Small Scandal on Social Networks Due to a News Article Written by an Artificial Intelligence on the Technology Portal Gizmodo. The Note Was a Disaster , as It Was a Chronology of Star Wars Movies in Disarray and With Inaccuracies, but the Worrying Thing is That the Article Ranked Positively in Google's Search Algorithm.
That is to Say, We Are Reaching a Time in Which Bots Are Writing for Bots Themselves, and Worse Yet, Misinforming Human Users. Strictly Speaking, the Gizmodo Bot, Despite the Inaccuracies, Was Not at Fault, It Created an Attractive Piece to Be Included in the First Searches on Google. The Problem is With the Search Algorithm, Incapable of Choosing a Piece With Quality Information. Does This Mean That Generative Artificial Intelligences Are a Disaster? Not at All, It Simply Shows That There is a Learning Curve That Requires Time and Work, Despite the Millions of Dollars Invested and the Expectations of Millions of Technology Fans. By the Way, Chatgpt for the First Time in History Recorded a Decrease in Its Number of Users.
, det får bli lite mer av det riktiga li(e)r(o)et. Inget går upp mot det riktiga.